U.S. Connected Healthcare Market Size, Share & Forecast 2026–2032

ID: MR-10662 | Published: November 2026
Download PDF Sample

Report Highlights

  • ✓Country: United States
  • ✓Market: U.S. Connected Healthcare Market
  • ✓Market Size 2024: USD 58.4 billion
  • ✓Market Size 2032: USD 121.7 billion
  • ✓CAGR: 9.6%
  • ✓Base Year: 2025
  • ✓Forecast Period: 2026–2032
Market Growth Chart
Want Detailed Insights - Download Sample
Analyst Findings and Recommendations
FINDING 01
Information Blocking Penalties Reshape Economics: Information blocking enforcement under the 21st Century Cures Act shifts pricing power toward device makers with certified FHIR APIs. Hospitals now demand certified FHIR pipelines from Medtronic and Abbott, because CMS payer data rules make interoperability a contract condition.
FINDING 02
Telehealth Lapses Will Not Stall: Analysts treat recurring Medicare telehealth extensions as the main threat to connected care. Remote monitoring billed under CPT 99453 through 99458 is now embedded in Medicare Advantage value-based contracts, so demand outlasts short-term lapses.
ANALYST RECOMMENDATION

Analyst Recommendation — Certify FHIR Before Procurement: Medical device manufacturers and hospital system buyers should require ONC-certified health IT modules and HTI-1 decision support transparency documentation from every connected vendor before contracts renew in the first half of 2026. This prevents information-blocking exposure before Medicare attestation deadlines.

U.S. Connected Healthcare: Market Overview

The U.S. connected healthcare market generated an estimated USD 58.4 billion in 2024 and is forecast to reach USD 121.7 billion by 2032. Spending spans connected medical devices, remote patient monitoring platforms, telehealth infrastructure, and interoperable clinical data systems. Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, rather than consumer demand, sets the commercial boundaries of this market. Government payers, not retail buyers, determine which devices reach scale, and private insurers largely follow Medicare coding decisions.

Market structure reflects policy history. The HITECH Act of 2009 created the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, which later evolved into the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program administered by CMS, and it funded the hospital data infrastructure that connected devices now plug into. Private sector firms, including Medtronic, Philips, and Abbott, lead device engineering and hardware manufacturing, while federal agencies set connectivity standards and payment rules. Government has been the dominant force in demand creation, and the private sector leads in product engineering and software platforms.

Policy-Driven Growth in U.S. Connected Healthcare

The 21st Century Cures Act, signed in December 2016, required the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology to establish information blocking rules and certification criteria for electronic health records. Information blocking provisions took effect in 2021, creating a legal incentive for device makers to ship data through standardized FHIR interfaces. The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement, recognized in 2022, adds a national exchange layer that lets connected devices feed hospital records without bespoke integrations.

CMS created separate Current Procedural Terminology codes for remote physiologic monitoring (CPT 99453, 99454, 99457, and 99458) and pays for them under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, turning device data into billable services. The FCC's Rural Health Care Program, funded through the Universal Service Fund and administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company, subsidizes broadband for eligible rural clinics through its Healthcare Connect Fund. Together these three mechanisms convert policy into predictable device volume, because each creates a reimbursable or subsidized purchase path.

Regulatory Barriers and Compliance Costs

Connected devices that transmit diagnostic data must clear FDA premarket review, and Section 524B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, added by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, requires manufacturers to submit cybersecurity plans and a software bill of materials. The FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health administers these reviews, and industry estimates place added cybersecurity delays at three to six months on a 510(k) clearance timeline. Manufacturers must budget for penetration testing and ongoing vulnerability disclosure programs for every product line.

The HHS Office for Civil Rights enforces the HIPAA Security Rule, and its January 2025 proposed amendments would make encryption and multifactor authentication mandatory for covered entities and their business associates, which includes many device vendors. Non-HIPAA wearable and app data falls under the FTC Health Breach Notification Rule, updated in 2024, while Washington's My Health My Data Act, effective March 31, 2024 and enforced by the state Attorney General, requires separate consent for consumer health data collection. Multistate compliance therefore adds legal review cost to every product launch, and this cost falls heaviest on smaller device start-ups.

Policy-Created Opportunities in the U.S.

The Rural Health Transformation Program, created by Public Law 119-21 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted July 2025), allocates 50 billion dollars across fiscal years 2026 to 2030, administered by CMS through state applications. State proposals for remote monitoring fleets and broadband-enabled clinics create procurement demand for connected devices in counties with limited hospital capacity. Vendors that bundle hardware, connectivity, and clinical analytics will win the largest state awards.

The Acute Hospital Care at Home waiver, first authorized under Section 1135 of the Social Security Act during the COVID-19 emergency, allows hospitals to treat qualifying patients at home with connected monitoring equipment. CMS's Health Tech Ecosystem initiative, launched in July 2025, invites technology firms to pledge interoperable, consumer-facing applications that connect to certified EHRs. Firms that certify early position themselves for hospital-at-home contracts.

Market at a Glance

MetricValue
Market Size 2024USD 58.4 billion
Market Size 2032USD 121.7 billion
Growth Rate (CAGR)9.6%
Most Critical Decision FactorCertified FHIR interoperability and reimbursement code eligibility
Largest RegionSouth Census Region
Competitive StructureConcentrated hardware leaders with fragmented software and digital health entrants

Leading Market Participants

  • Medtronic
  • Philips
  • GE HealthCare
  • Abbott
  • Dexcom
  • Masimo
  • iRhythm Technologies
  • Teladoc Health
  • Oracle Health
  • Omron Healthcare

Regulatory and Policy Environment

The primary legislation is the 21st Century Cures Act (Public Law 114-255), administered by ONC, the CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule (CMS-9115-F), administered by CMS, and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, administered by FDA. Key compliance requirements include certified health IT under 45 CFR Part 170, FHIR-based patient access APIs, premarket cybersecurity documentation, and HIPAA safeguards enforced by HHS OCR. Upcoming changes include the HIPAA Security Rule final rule, expected in 2026 according to the HHS regulatory agenda, and ONC's HTI-series rules on decision support transparency.

Compared with regional peers, the U.S. framework is sector-specific and fragmented, whereas the European Union combines Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices with the European Health Data Space Regulation, which entered into force in 2025, creating a harmonized pre-market and data-access regime across member states. Canada licenses devices under the Medical Devices Regulations (SOR/98-282), offering a single national licensing pathway. The U.S. retains an advantage in reimbursement speed, since CMS payment codes are updated through the annual Physician Fee Schedule cycle, but it trails the EU in harmonized patient data-access rights.

Long-Term Policy Outlook for U.S. Connected Healthcare

By 2032, the HIPAA Security Rule amendments are expected to become binding, requiring annual compliance audits, restoration of critical systems within 72 hours, and asset inventories that cover connected devices. Congress must also decide whether Medicare telehealth flexibilities become permanent, a decision that determines whether remote monitoring codes retain their current volume economics. Both outcomes will define device portfolio planning for the forecast period.

The Rural Health Transformation Program will channel 50 billion dollars through fiscal years 2026 to 2030 to state-administered projects, favoring remote monitoring and broadband-enabled care in underserved counties. Consolidation is expected among device vendors that cannot meet Section 524B lifecycle obligations, while state privacy statutes modeled on Washington's My Health My Data Act spread across additional states before 2032. Vendors that document compliance early will capture the most durable public-sector contracts.

Frequently Asked Questions

The FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health regulates connected medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Section 524B requires cyber devices to include cybersecurity plans and a software bill of materials in premarket submissions.
ONC enforces information blocking rules under the 21st Century Cures Act against health IT developers and health information networks. Civil monetary penalties of up to 1 million dollars apply per violation.
HHS published proposed amendments in January 2025 that would mandate encryption and multifactor authentication. HHS has scheduled a final rule for 2026, with compliance obligations following a transition period.
Washington's My Health My Data Act applies to consumer health data outside HIPAA coverage and requires separate consent for collection. The FTC Health Breach Notification Rule separately requires breach notification for non-HIPAA health apps and devices.
CMS pays for remote physiologic monitoring under CPT codes 99453, 99454, 99457, and 99458 through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Billing requires documented patient consent and a qualifying clinical relationship with the billing practitioner.

Market Segmentation

By Product Type
  • Wearable Biosensors
  • Remote Patient Monitoring Systems
  • Connected Implantable Devices
  • Smart Infusion Pumps
  • Telehealth Carts
By End User
  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Home Healthcare Providers
  • Accountable Care Organizations
  • Medicare Advantage Plans
By Connectivity Technology
  • Bluetooth Low Energy
  • Cellular LTE-M and 5G
  • Wi-Fi 6
  • Medical Body Area Networks
  • Low-Power Wide-Area Networks

Table of Contents

Chapter 01 Methodology and Scope
1.1 Research Methodology
1.2 Scope and Definitions
1.3 Data Sources
Chapter 02 Executive Summary
2.1 Report Highlights
2.2 Market Size and Forecast 2024-2032
Chapter 03 U.S. Connected Healthcare - Market Analysis
3.1 Market Overview
3.2 Growth Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
Chapter 04 Product Type Insights
4.1 Wearable Biosensors
4.2 Remote Patient Monitoring Systems
4.3 Connected Implantable Devices
4.4 Smart Infusion Pumps
4.5 Others
Chapter 05 End User Insights
5.1 Hospitals
5.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.3 Home Healthcare Providers
5.4 Accountable Care Organizations
5.5 Others
Chapter 06 Connectivity Technology Insights
6.1 Bluetooth Low Energy
6.2 Cellular LTE-M and 5G
6.3 Wi-Fi 6
6.4 Medical Body Area Networks
6.5 Others
Chapter 07 Competitive Landscape
7.1 Market Players
7.2 Leading Market Participants
7.2.1 Medtronic
7.2.2 Philips
7.2.3 GE HealthCare
7.2.4 Abbott
7.2.5 Dexcom
7.2.6 Masimo
7.2.7 iRhythm Technologies
7.2.8 Teladoc Health
7.2.9 Oracle Health
7.2.10 Omron Healthcare
7.3 Regulatory Environment
7.4 Outlook

Research Framework and Methodological Approach

Information
Procurement

Information
Analysis

Market Formulation
& Validation

Overview of Our Research Process

MarketsNXT follows a structured, multi-stage research framework designed to ensure accuracy, reliability, and strategic relevance of every published study. Our methodology integrates globally accepted research standards with industry best practices in data collection, modeling, verification, and insight generation.

1. Data Acquisition Strategy

Robust data collection is the foundation of our analytical process. MarketsNXT employs a layered sourcing model.

Secondary Research
  • Company annual reports & SEC filings
  • Industry association publications
  • Technical journals & white papers
  • Government databases (World Bank, OECD)
  • Paid commercial databases
Primary Research
  • KOL Interviews (CEOs, Marketing Heads)
  • Surveys with industry participants
  • Distributor & supplier discussions
  • End-user feedback loops
  • Questionnaires for gap analysis

Analytical Modeling and Insight Development

After collection, datasets are processed and interpreted using multiple analytical techniques to identify baseline market values, demand patterns, growth drivers, constraints, and opportunity clusters.

2. Market Estimation Techniques

MarketsNXT applies multiple estimation pathways to strengthen forecast accuracy.

Bottom-up Approach

Country Level Market Size
Regional Market Size
Global Market Size

Aggregating granular demand data from country level to derive global figures.

Top-down Approach

Parent Market Size
Target Market Share
Segmented Market Size

Breaking down the parent industry market to identify the target serviceable market.

Supply Chain Anchored Forecasting

MarketsNXT integrates value chain intelligence into its forecasting structure to ensure commercial realism and operational alignment.

Supply-Side Evaluation

Revenue and capacity estimates are developed through company financial reviews, product portfolio mapping, benchmarking of competitive positioning, and commercialization tracking.

3. Market Engineering & Validation

Market engineering involves the triangulation of data from multiple sources to minimize errors.

01 Data Mining

Extensive gathering of raw data.

02 Analysis

Statistical regression & trend analysis.

03 Validation

Cross-verification with experts.

04 Final Output

Publication of market study.

Client-Centric Research Delivery

MarketsNXT positions research delivery as a collaborative engagement rather than a static information transfer. Analysts work with clients to clarify objectives, interpret findings, and connect insights to strategic decisions.