U.S. Surgical Stents Market Size, Share & Forecast 2026–2032

ID: MR-9846 | Published: November 2026
Download PDF Sample

Report Highlights

  • ✓Country: United States
  • ✓Market: Surgical Stents
  • ✓Market Size 2024: USD 4.12 billion
  • ✓Market Size 2032: USD 6.41 billion
  • ✓CAGR: 5.7%
  • ✓Base Year: 2025
  • ✓Forecast Period: 2026–2032
Market Growth Chart
Want Detailed Insights - Download Sample
Analyst Findings and Recommendations
FINDING 01
Medicare DRG Bundling Compression: Medicare pays a fixed MS-DRG rate for PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation, so hospitals absorb manufacturer price increases from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Stent revenue growth now depends on procedure volume from the aging U.S. cohort, not on pricing.
FINDING 02
Bioresorbable Scaffolds Stalled: The assumption that bioresorbable scaffolds will displace metallic stents is wrong. Abbott discontinued Absorb in the U.S. in 2017 and no successor scaffold has received PMA approval. Drug-eluting metallic stents will hold the U.S. coronary segment through 2032.
ANALYST RECOMMENDATION

Analyst Recommendation — Supplier Certification Before QMSR: Hospital procurement leads should renegotiate U.S. stent supply contracts before February 2, 2026, when FDA's Quality Management System Regulation takes effect. Require suppliers to certify ISO 13485:2016 conformance, since non-certified lots face recall and supply-interruption risk under DRG-fixed margins.

Surgical Stents in the U.S.: Market Overview

The U.S. surgical stents market, spanning coronary, peripheral vascular, biliary, and urological devices, was valued at USD 4.12 billion in 2024 and is forecast to reach USD 6.41 billion by 2032 at a 5.7% CAGR. Coronary drug-eluting stents form the largest revenue pool, supported by Medicare coverage of percutaneous coronary intervention. The structure is consolidated: Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Becton Dickinson hold most coronary and peripheral volume, while Cook Medical, W. L. Gore & Associates, and Merit Medical compete in endovascular and non-vascular niches.

Government has been the dominant force in demand formation, not in manufacturing. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sets stent reimbursement through the Inpatient Prospective Payment System's MS-DRG 246 to 251 bundles and the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System, which together determine where and how often stents are implanted. Private manufacturers have led device innovation, with the FDA's Premarket Approval pathway under Section 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act governing entry for Class III coronary products, while integrated delivery networks shape purchasing through group contracts.

Policy-Driven Growth in U.S. Surgical Stents

Three mechanisms drive demand most directly. First, the New Technology Add-On Payment (NTAP) under the annual IPPS final rule reimburses hospitals 65% of the cost of qualifying new stent technologies above the standard MS-DRG payment, so hospitals adopt newly approved stents faster than DRG rates alone would allow. Second, CMS finalised the Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies (TCET) pathway in August 2024, which caps participation at five breakthrough devices per year and extends Medicare coverage under coverage with evidence development while clinical data accumulates.

Third, Section 515B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, created by the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, establishes the Breakthrough Devices Program, which grants FDA priority interactive review for devices treating life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating conditions. Designees accelerate their path to Medicare coverage through TCET. Together, these mechanisms convert regulatory authorisation into reimbursed procedure volume, which is the direct driver of the market's 5.7% CAGR.

Regulatory Barriers and Compliance Costs

The FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) administers the PMA process for Class III coronary stents. Standard original PMA user fees exceeded USD 575,000 in FY2025 under the Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA V), and the 180-day FDA review goal rarely equals total elapsed time once manufacturers answer major deficiency letters. Manufacturers also face Certificate of Need requirements administered by state health departments; New York's Public Health Law Article 28 requires approval before a hospital adds cardiac catheterisation services, delaying new stent-using capacity by months.

Sterilisation adds a second layer. Most vascular stents are sterilised with ethylene oxide (EtO), which the Environmental Protection Agency regulates under the Commercial Sterilizer National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants at 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart O, tightened in 2024 to lower permitted emissions and increase monitoring. Supply exposure rises further because the Department of Commerce's Section 232 investigation into imported medical devices, opened in 2025, threatens to raise landed costs for imported nitinol components.

Policy-Created Opportunities in the U.S.

The TCET pathway and the Breakthrough Devices Program create a near-term opportunity for manufacturers of bioresorbable and drug-coated peripheral stents that lack established Medicare coverage. Designees completing TCET participation gain coverage while funding the post-market registries CMS requires, converting clinical evidence into national coverage. Veterans Affairs procurement offers a second channel: the VA National Acquisition Center manages medical device Federal Supply Schedule contracts under FAR Subpart 8.4, awarding multi-year price agreements to compliant suppliers.

A third opportunity arises from the QMSR, effective February 2, 2026, which requires manufacturers to align quality systems with ISO 13485:2016. Contract manufacturers certifying early can capture supply agreements from stent makers seeking audit-ready partners. Domestic manufacturing gains follow directly from the Section 232 outcome, as tariffs raise the landed cost of imported finished stents relative to devices assembled with domestically sourced nitinol.

Market at a Glance

IndicatorDetail
Market Size 2024USD 4.12 billion
Market Size 2032USD 6.41 billion
Growth Rate (CAGR)5.7%
Most Critical Decision FactorMedicare DRG reimbursement rate for stent-based procedures
Largest RegionSouth Region (Texas, Florida, Georgia)
Competitive StructureConsolidated; top four manufacturers hold most coronary volume

Leading Market Participants

  • Boston Scientific
  • Abbott Vascular
  • Medtronic
  • Becton Dickinson
  • Cook Medical
  • Terumo
  • Biotronik
  • W. L. Gore & Associates
  • Cordis
  • Merit Medical

Regulatory and Policy Environment

The primary legislation is the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), administered by FDA's CDRH. Section 510(k) and Section 515 set premarket pathways, Section 515B governs breakthrough designation, and 21 CFR Part 820 sets quality system requirements. Compliance obligations include Medical Device Reporting under 21 CFR Part 803, requiring reports within 30 calendar days of a death or serious injury, and Unique Device Identification under 21 CFR Part 830. Physician payment disclosure falls under Open Payments, codified at Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act and implemented at 42 CFR Part 403 Subpart I.

The QMSR amending 21 CFR Part 820 takes effect February 2, 2026, incorporating ISO 13485:2016 by reference. MDUFA VI negotiations covering FY2028 to FY2032 must conclude with congressional reauthorisation by September 30, 2027. Against regional peers, U.S. PMA reviews typically run 12 to 18 months, broadly comparable to EU MDR notified body reviews, which Regulation (EU) 2023/607 supports through an extended legacy transition for Class III implantables to December 31, 2027. Japan's PMDA requires local clinical data, placing the U.S. framework between the two.

Long-Term Policy Outlook for U.S. Surgical Stents

MDUFA VI reauthorisation by September 30, 2027 will set FDA review performance goals through FY2032 and determine whether PMA review capacity keeps pace with breakthrough designations. CMS will revise MS-DRG relative weights in each annual IPPS rule through 2032, directly altering hospital margins on PCI with stent implantation. TCET participation caps will shape how quickly new peripheral and bioresorbable devices reach reimbursed use.

Section 232 tariff outcomes will reshape supply chains by 2032, pushing domestic nitinol processing and EtO-alternative sterilisation higher on manufacturer investment agendas. The QMSR transition will consolidate suppliers that cannot meet audit standards. By 2032, the market's USD 6.41 billion value will rest on procedure volume from the aging population rather than on price.

Frequently Asked Questions

FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health approves Class III coronary stents through Premarket Approval under Section 515 of the FD&C Act. Many peripheral and biliary stents clear through 510(k) notification under Section 510(k).
The Quality Management System Regulation amends 21 CFR Part 820 to incorporate ISO 13485:2016 and takes effect February 2, 2026. Manufacturers must update procedures and internal audit systems before that date.
Inpatient PCI is reimbursed through MS-DRGs 246 to 251 under the IPPS, while outpatient procedures follow OPPS payment classifications. NTAP provides 65% add-on payments for qualifying new stent technologies.
The Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies pathway, finalised by CMS in August 2024, extends coverage to breakthrough devices under coverage with evidence development. CMS limits participation to five devices per year.
Manufacturers must file Medical Device Reports under 21 CFR Part 803 within 30 calendar days of a death or serious injury and apply Unique Device Identification under 21 CFR Part 830. Physician payments must also be disclosed under Open Payments at 42 CFR Part 403 Subpart I.

Market Segmentation

By Application
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Biliary Obstruction
  • Urological Obstruction
By Material
  • Drug-Eluting
  • Bare-Metal
  • Bioresorbable
  • Covered Stents
By End User
  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories
  • Specialty Clinics

Table of Contents

Chapter 01 Methodology and Scope
1.1 Research Methodology
1.2 Scope and Definitions
1.3 Data Sources
Chapter 02 Executive Summary
2.1 Report Highlights
2.2 Market Size and Forecast 2024-2032
Chapter 03 U.S. Surgical Stents - Market Analysis
3.1 Market Overview
3.2 Growth Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
Chapter 04 Application Insights
4.1 Coronary Artery Disease
4.2 Peripheral Artery Disease
4.3 Biliary Obstruction
4.4 Urological Obstruction
4.5 Others
Chapter 05 Material Insights
5.1 Drug-Eluting
5.2 Bare-Metal
5.3 Bioresorbable
5.4 Covered Stents
5.5 Others
Chapter 06 End User Insights
6.1 Hospitals
6.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
6.3 Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories
6.4 Specialty Clinics
6.5 Others
Chapter 07 Competitive Landscape
7.1 Market Players
7.2 Leading Market Participants
7.2.1 Boston Scientific
7.2.2 Abbott Vascular
7.2.3 Medtronic
7.2.4 Becton Dickinson
7.2.5 Cook Medical
7.2.6 Terumo
7.2.7 Biotronik
7.2.8 W. L. Gore & Associates
7.2.9 Cordis
7.2.10 Merit Medical
7.3 Regulatory Environment
7.4 Outlook

Research Framework and Methodological Approach

Information
Procurement

Information
Analysis

Market Formulation
& Validation

Overview of Our Research Process

MarketsNXT follows a structured, multi-stage research framework designed to ensure accuracy, reliability, and strategic relevance of every published study. Our methodology integrates globally accepted research standards with industry best practices in data collection, modeling, verification, and insight generation.

1. Data Acquisition Strategy

Robust data collection is the foundation of our analytical process. MarketsNXT employs a layered sourcing model.

Secondary Research
  • Company annual reports & SEC filings
  • Industry association publications
  • Technical journals & white papers
  • Government databases (World Bank, OECD)
  • Paid commercial databases
Primary Research
  • KOL Interviews (CEOs, Marketing Heads)
  • Surveys with industry participants
  • Distributor & supplier discussions
  • End-user feedback loops
  • Questionnaires for gap analysis

Analytical Modeling and Insight Development

After collection, datasets are processed and interpreted using multiple analytical techniques to identify baseline market values, demand patterns, growth drivers, constraints, and opportunity clusters.

2. Market Estimation Techniques

MarketsNXT applies multiple estimation pathways to strengthen forecast accuracy.

Bottom-up Approach

Country Level Market Size
Regional Market Size
Global Market Size

Aggregating granular demand data from country level to derive global figures.

Top-down Approach

Parent Market Size
Target Market Share
Segmented Market Size

Breaking down the parent industry market to identify the target serviceable market.

Supply Chain Anchored Forecasting

MarketsNXT integrates value chain intelligence into its forecasting structure to ensure commercial realism and operational alignment.

Supply-Side Evaluation

Revenue and capacity estimates are developed through company financial reviews, product portfolio mapping, benchmarking of competitive positioning, and commercialization tracking.

3. Market Engineering & Validation

Market engineering involves the triangulation of data from multiple sources to minimize errors.

01 Data Mining

Extensive gathering of raw data.

02 Analysis

Statistical regression & trend analysis.

03 Validation

Cross-verification with experts.

04 Final Output

Publication of market study.

Client-Centric Research Delivery

MarketsNXT positions research delivery as a collaborative engagement rather than a static information transfer. Analysts work with clients to clarify objectives, interpret findings, and connect insights to strategic decisions.