U.S. Ultrasound Devices Market Size, Share & Forecast 2026–2032

ID: MR-9452 | Published: November 2026
Download PDF Sample

Report Highlights

  • ✓Country: United States
  • ✓Market: Ultrasound Devices
  • ✓Market Size 2024: USD 6.4 billion
  • ✓Market Size 2032: USD 9.6 billion
  • ✓CAGR: 5.2%
  • ✓Base Year: 2025
  • ✓Forecast Period: 2026–2032
Market Growth Chart
Want Detailed Insights - Download Sample
Analyst Findings and Recommendations
FINDING 01
Handheld Units Gaining Share: Handheld units from Butterfly Network and Clarius Mobile Health are taking share from cart-based platforms in U.S. physician offices. Medicare pays identical CPT codes regardless of device form factor, so low-cost probes compete directly with GE HealthCare and Philips carts.
FINDING 02
Cybersecurity Documentation Outweighs Review: Most analysts treat 510(k) clearance as the main barrier to U.S. ultrasound entry. Section 524B cybersecurity rules now require software bills of materials for connected probes, and that documentation costs small entrants more than the review itself.
ANALYST RECOMMENDATION

Analyst Recommendation — Lock in Handheld Supply: Procurement leaders at U.S. critical access hospitals should lock in handheld ultrasound fleet contracts during the second half of 2026. Specify FDA-cleared AI software under predetermined change control plans to avoid re-clearance delays.

U.S. Ultrasound Devices: Market Overview

The U.S. ultrasound devices market reached USD 6.4 billion in 2024, the largest national ultrasound market in the world. Cart-based systems still dominate hospital radiology, cardiology and obstetric departments, while handheld and point-of-care units are expanding in physician offices and emergency departments. Federal payment policy has shaped this structure more than any single manufacturer, because Medicare Part B reimbursement sets the economics of every outpatient scan. Government procurement and reimbursement together account for the majority of unit demand.

Private companies lead on device engineering and distribution. GE HealthCare, Philips, Siemens Healthineers and FUJIFILM SonoSite compete on cart platforms and AI-enabled workflow software, while Butterfly Network has built a semiconductor-based handheld line since its 2018 FDA clearance. Government has dominated demand, with Medicare and Medicaid financing most diagnostic volume and the Department of Veterans Affairs buying through national contracts. The Food and Drug Administration sets the entry gate but does not set the price. Policy therefore determines who buys, while manufacturers determine what is bought.

Policy-Driven Growth in U.S. Ultrasound Devices

Three policy mechanisms drive U.S. demand. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) annual Physician Fee Schedule, authorized under Section 1848 of the Social Security Act, sets payment for abdominal ultrasound (CPT 76700) and pelvic ultrasound (CPT 76856). Public Law 119-21 created a USD 50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, funding state investment in rural hospital equipment. The CMS Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System under 42 CFR Part 419 sets ambulatory payment classification rates for outpatient scans.

Each mechanism converts into unit demand through a different channel. Fee schedule rates determine whether a practice buys a second cart or a handheld probe, because revenue per scan sets the payback period. OPPS rates move procedures into hospital outpatient departments, which favor higher-throughput cart systems. The Rural Health Transformation Program turns federal allocations into capital purchases across more than 1,300 Critical Access Hospitals. Together they sustain replacement cycles through 2032.

Regulatory Barriers and Compliance Costs

Market entry begins with FDA premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, with diagnostic ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging systems classified under 21 CFR 892.1550. The Center for Devices and Radiological Health sets a 90-FDA-day review goal under the Medical Device User Fee Amendments, and standard submissions carry user fees above USD 20,000. From February 2, 2026, manufacturers must also comply with the Quality Management System Regulation in 21 CFR Part 820, which aligns quality rules with ISO 13485:2016 and adds audit documentation for every design change.

Commercial and state-level rules add further cost. The Stark Law, 42 U.S.C. 1395nn, and the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b), restrict physician referral to in-office ultrasound they own, forcing many independent practices to lease equipment. New York's certificate of need requirement under Public Health Law Article 28, administered by the New York State Department of Health, requires state approval before certain imaging equipment is added. Section 524B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires cybersecurity plans and software bills of materials for connected probes, adding documentation cost to each release.

Policy-Created Opportunities in the U.S.

The FDA's final guidance on Predetermined Change Control Plans for AI-enabled device software, issued in December 2024, creates a defined route for ultrasound AI updates without new 510(k) submissions. GE HealthCare's 2023 acquisition of Caption Health demonstrated the commercial value of AI guidance for novice operators, and it set the template for software-led differentiation. Vendors that file PCCPs with initial clearances can ship algorithm improvements on a rolling basis, converting hardware sales into recurring software subscriptions.

The Rural Health Transformation Program opens a direct channel for handheld and portable systems. Critical Access Hospitals with limited capital budgets can use allocations to acquire handheld fleets rather than cart systems that cost several times more per unit. The Department of Veterans Affairs buys ultrasound through the National Acquisition Center in Hines, Illinois, under Federal Supply Schedule contracts, giving vendors that secure FSS listing a standardized federal channel.

Market at a Glance

MetricValue
Market Size 2024USD 6.4 billion
Market Size 2032USD 9.6 billion
Growth Rate (CAGR)5.2%
Most Critical Decision FactorMedicare Physician Fee Schedule reimbursement rates
Largest RegionSouth census region
Competitive StructureConsolidated oligopoly with fragmented handheld entrants

Leading Market Participants

  • GE HealthCare
  • Philips Healthcare
  • Siemens Healthineers
  • FUJIFILM SonoSite
  • Canon Medical Systems USA
  • Butterfly Network
  • Mindray North America
  • Esaote North America
  • Clarius Mobile Health
  • EXO Imaging

Regulatory and Policy Environment

The primary legislation is the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), administered by the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Key compliance requirements include Section 510(k) premarket notification, the Quality Management System Regulation in 21 CFR Part 820 effective February 2, 2026, Unique Device Identification under 21 CFR Part 801, medical device reporting under 21 CFR Part 803, and cybersecurity documentation under Section 524B, added by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023. Reimbursement operates under separate Social Security Act authority administered by CMS.

Upcoming changes center on user fee reauthorization. The Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA V) cover fiscal years 2023 through 2027, so MDUFA VI negotiations must conclude before the September 2027 expiry. Compared with peer jurisdictions, the U.S. 510(k) pathway clears devices faster than the EU Medical Device Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/745), where notified bodies control review timing and transition deadlines were extended to 2027 and 2028 under Regulation (EU) 2023/607. Canada's Medical Devices Regulations (SOR/98-282) apply a similar risk-class structure through Health Canada but require a Medical Device Licence for Class II devices.

Long-Term Policy Outlook for Ultrasound Devices in the U.S.

By 2032, three policy shifts will reshape the market. Medicare payment reform will keep tightening office-based ultrasound economics, as CMS applies efficiency adjustments to non-time-based services in annual Physician Fee Schedule rules, reducing per-scan margins for independent imaging practices. Congress must reauthorize the Medical Device User Fee Amendments before September 2027, and MDUFA VI commitments will determine FDA review resources for AI-enabled probes through 2032.

The Rural Health Transformation Program ends after fiscal year 2030, creating a funding cliff that will force rural hospitals to justify equipment replacement under standard Medicare Part B and OPPS economics by 2031. Section 524B cybersecurity enforcement will raise the bar for connected probes, favoring vendors with established security operations. Handheld vendors that secure PCCP-backed clearances early will lock in installed base before those rules tighten, leaving the market concentrated among roughly six platform owners by 2032.

Frequently Asked Questions

Most diagnostic ultrasound systems enter the market through 510(k) premarket notification under 21 CFR 892.1550. Devices with novel AI functions may instead require De Novo classification if no predicate device exists.
Section 524B applies to connected devices that include software, which covers most networked ultrasound probes and systems. Manufacturers must submit cybersecurity plans and software bills of materials with their marketing submissions.
Medicare pays for each ultrasound procedure under the annual Physician Fee Schedule, so per-scan rates determine the revenue a purchaser can expect from a device. Lower rates extend payback periods and push buyers toward lower-cost handheld systems.
Physicians can own in-office ultrasound equipment, but the Stark Law restricts self-referral for designated health services. Ownership arrangements must meet an exception, such as the in-office ancillary services exception, to remain compliant.
The Quality Management System Regulation in 21 CFR Part 820 takes effect on February 2, 2026, replacing the former Quality System Regulation. Manufacturers must align design controls and audit documentation with ISO 13485:2016 by that date.

Market Segmentation

By Product Type
  • Cart-Based Systems
  • Portable Systems
  • Handheld Devices
  • Ultrasound Probes
By End User
  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Physician Offices
  • Ambulatory Imaging Centers
By Application
  • Cardiology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Radiology
  • Emergency Medicine

Table of Contents

Chapter 01 Methodology and Scope
1.1 Research Methodology
1.2 Scope and Definitions
1.3 Data Sources
Chapter 02 Executive Summary
2.1 Report Highlights
2.2 Market Size and Forecast 2024-2032
Chapter 03 U.S. Ultrasound Devices - Market Analysis
3.1 Market Overview
3.2 Growth Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
Chapter 04 Product Type Insights
4.1 Cart-Based Systems
4.2 Portable Systems
4.3 Handheld Devices
4.4 Ultrasound Probes
4.5 Others
Chapter 05 End User Insights
5.1 Hospitals
5.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.3 Physician Offices
5.4 Ambulatory Imaging Centers
5.5 Others
Chapter 06 Application Insights
6.1 Cardiology
6.2 Obstetrics and Gynecology
6.3 Radiology
6.4 Emergency Medicine
6.5 Others
Chapter 07 Competitive Landscape
7.1 Market Players
7.2 Leading Market Participants
7.2.1 GE HealthCare
7.2.2 Philips Healthcare
7.2.3 Siemens Healthineers
7.2.4 FUJIFILM SonoSite
7.2.5 Canon Medical Systems USA
7.2.6 Butterfly Network
7.2.7 Mindray North America
7.2.8 Esaote North America
7.2.9 Clarius Mobile Health
7.2.10 EXO Imaging
7.3 Regulatory Environment
7.4 Outlook

Research Framework and Methodological Approach

Information
Procurement

Information
Analysis

Market Formulation
& Validation

Overview of Our Research Process

MarketsNXT follows a structured, multi-stage research framework designed to ensure accuracy, reliability, and strategic relevance of every published study. Our methodology integrates globally accepted research standards with industry best practices in data collection, modeling, verification, and insight generation.

1. Data Acquisition Strategy

Robust data collection is the foundation of our analytical process. MarketsNXT employs a layered sourcing model.

Secondary Research
  • Company annual reports & SEC filings
  • Industry association publications
  • Technical journals & white papers
  • Government databases (World Bank, OECD)
  • Paid commercial databases
Primary Research
  • KOL Interviews (CEOs, Marketing Heads)
  • Surveys with industry participants
  • Distributor & supplier discussions
  • End-user feedback loops
  • Questionnaires for gap analysis

Analytical Modeling and Insight Development

After collection, datasets are processed and interpreted using multiple analytical techniques to identify baseline market values, demand patterns, growth drivers, constraints, and opportunity clusters.

2. Market Estimation Techniques

MarketsNXT applies multiple estimation pathways to strengthen forecast accuracy.

Bottom-up Approach

Country Level Market Size
Regional Market Size
Global Market Size

Aggregating granular demand data from country level to derive global figures.

Top-down Approach

Parent Market Size
Target Market Share
Segmented Market Size

Breaking down the parent industry market to identify the target serviceable market.

Supply Chain Anchored Forecasting

MarketsNXT integrates value chain intelligence into its forecasting structure to ensure commercial realism and operational alignment.

Supply-Side Evaluation

Revenue and capacity estimates are developed through company financial reviews, product portfolio mapping, benchmarking of competitive positioning, and commercialization tracking.

3. Market Engineering & Validation

Market engineering involves the triangulation of data from multiple sources to minimize errors.

01 Data Mining

Extensive gathering of raw data.

02 Analysis

Statistical regression & trend analysis.

03 Validation

Cross-verification with experts.

04 Final Output

Publication of market study.

Client-Centric Research Delivery

MarketsNXT positions research delivery as a collaborative engagement rather than a static information transfer. Analysts work with clients to clarify objectives, interpret findings, and connect insights to strategic decisions.